Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 01:50

Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Scientists Uncover Giant Spiders That Once Terrorized Jurassic Earth - The Daily Galaxy
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
An unexpected Seahawks player appears in Madden 26 reveal trailer - Field Gulls
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Can you DM your uncle’s wife for a video?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
What are some examples of a threat to democracy in India?
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.